What is VO2 Max?
VO2 max, also known as maximal oxygen consumption, is defined as a measurement of the maximum amount of oxygen an individual can use during intense exercise. In other words, it’s a reflection of an individual’s aerobic fitness and represents the ability of the cardiorespiratory system to transport oxygen from the air to the tissues (Hawkins et al., 2007). VO2 max is measured in milliliters of oxygen used in one minute per kilogram of body weight (ml/kg/min). Essentially, it measures the capacity of our aerobic system, with VO2 max being achieved when an individual reaches a point where the oxygen consumption plateaus, despite an increase in the exercise intensity (Rankovic et al., 2010). The higher the VO2 max, the more oxygen the body can utilize, and subsequently, the more energy can be produced during intense physical activities (Levine, 2008).
Testing VO2 Max
Testing VO2 max can be done either directly or indirectly. Direct measurement involves a gas analysis, often performed in a controlled laboratory setting. This is the most accurate method, requiring an individual to wear a mask connected to a metabolic cart while running on a treadmill or cycling on a stationary bike. The equipment measures the oxygen and carbon dioxide content of the inhaled and exhaled air, allowing for an accurate calculation of VO2 max. Direct measurement provides precise results, making it the gold standard for VO2 max testing. However, it is expensive and requires specialized equipment and expertise, making it less accessible for most people. Indirect measurement, on the other hand, uses predictive equations based on heart rate responses to specific exercise intensities and is often referred to as predicted maximal oxygen uptake. While less accurate than direct measurement, it’s more practical and widely used in various fitness settings (Santtila et al., 2013).
Other approaches for testing VO2 max include the Cooper test, the Rockport walking test, and wearable technologies, such as smart watches. The Cooper test is a simple running test. It involves running as far as possible in 12 minutes (Grant et al., 1995). While it’s easy to administer and requires minimal equipment, it’s not as accurate as lab testing. The Rockport walking test is similar to the Cooper test but involves walking a mile as quickly as possible (Weiglein et al., 2011). Recent advancements in wearable technology have made it possible to estimate VO2 max using devices like smartwatches and fitness trackers. Although less accurate than laboratory tests, they provide a convenient way to monitor and track fitness levels over time. Regardless of the method used, the test aims to measure the maximum amount of oxygen that an individual can use during intense exercise (Molina-Garcia et al., 2022).
VO2 Max: A Vital Health Marker
VO2 max is a direct indicator of aerobic fitness and a high VO2 max indicates that the body can efficiently transport and utilize oxygen during exercise, leading to better athletic performance. People with higher VO2 max levels are likely to have better endurance, making it possible to exercise for longer and more intensely without feeling fatigued. This is particularly relevant for athletes, with a higher VO2 max often correlating with better performance (Rankovic et al., 2010). As such, training methods aimed at increasing VO2 max are commonly used by endurance athletes to gain a competitive edge.
VO2 max is not only a measure of athletic performance but also serves as a vital health marker. Research consistently demonstrates a correlation between higher VO2 max and lower risks of various health conditions, including cardiovascular diseases, type 2 diabetes, and obesity (Carbone et al., 2019; Reusch et al., 2013). Furthermore, several studies have indicated that VO2 max is inversely associated with cardiovascular disease risk factors, such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, and obesity, and a higher VO2 max is, therefore, indicative of a healthier cardiovascular system (Brown et al., 1983; Khan et al., 2014; McMurray et al., 1998).
Studies have also shown a strong correlation between higher VO2 max levels and increased longevity. The Copenhagen City Heart Study, a large-scale research effort spanning several decades, found a direct relationship between VO2 max and overall mortality. Participants with higher VO2 max levels had a significantly lower risk of death from all causes. In the Copenhagen City Heart Study, which followed thousands of participants over a 46-year period, the findings revealed a clear link between higher VO2 max and a longer life. Even when adjusting for factors like smoking, age, and BMI, the results remained consistent (Schnohr et al., 2018). Other studies have replicated and reinforced the findings of the Copenhagen City Heart Study. These studies have consistently demonstrated that higher levels of cardiorespiratory fitness, as measured by VO2 max, are associated with a decrease in all-cause mortality. For example, a 2018 study by Mandsager et al. examined the association between midlife cardiorespiratory fitness and the long-term risk of mortality. The results showed that higher levels of cardiorespiratory fitness were associated with a lower risk of mortality, even after adjusting for other risk factors (Mandsager et al., 2018).
Conclusion
VO2 max is a critical indicator of cardiovascular fitness and overall health. It reflects the maximum capacity of the body to transport and utilize oxygen during exercise. Higher VO2 max levels are associated with better athletic performance, reduced risk of chronic diseases, and increased longevity. It’s not only a measure of an individual’s fitness level but also serves as a vital health marker. Regular physical activity and exercise training can increase VO2 max, leading to improved health outcomes and a better quality of life. As our understanding of VO2 max continues to grow, it reinforces the importance of staying physically active for a longer, healthier life.
Dan Tatro-M.S.-CSCS
CEO – OC FITNESS COACH
REFERENCES
Brown, T. E., Myles, W. S., & Allen, C. L. (1983). The relationship between aerobic fitness and certain cardiovascular risk factors. Aviat Space Environ Med, 54(6), 543-547.
Carbone, S., Canada, J. M., Billingsley, H. E., Siddiqui, M. S., Elagizi, A., & Lavie, C. J. (2019). Obesity paradox in cardiovascular disease: where do we stand? Vasc Health Risk Manag, 15, 89-100. https://doi.org/10.2147/vhrm.S168946
Grant, S., Corbett, K., Amjad, A. M., Wilson, J., & Aitchison, T. (1995). A comparison of methods of predicting maximum oxygen uptake. Br J Sports Med, 29(3), 147-152. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.29.3.147
Hawkins, M. N., Raven, P. B., Snell, P. G., Stray-Gundersen, J., & Levine, B. D. (2007). Maximal oxygen uptake as a parametric measure of cardiorespiratory capacity. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 39(1), 103-107. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.mss.0000241641.75101.64
Khan, H., Kunutsor, S., Rauramaa, R., Savonen, K., Kalogeropoulos, A. P., Georgiopoulou, V. V., Butler, J., & Laukkanen, J. A. (2014). Cardiorespiratory fitness and risk of heart failure: a population-based follow-up study. Eur J Heart Fail, 16(2), 180-188. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejhf.37
Levine, B. D. (2008). .VO2max: what do we know, and what do we still need to know? J Physiol, 586(1), 25-34. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2007.147629
Mandsager, K., Harb, S., Cremer, P., Phelan, D., Nissen, S. E., & Jaber, W. (2018). Association of Cardiorespiratory Fitness With Long-term Mortality Among Adults Undergoing Exercise Treadmill Testing. JAMA Netw Open, 1(6), e183605. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.3605
McMurray, R. G., Ainsworth, B. E., Harrell, J. S., Griggs, T. R., & Williams, O. D. (1998). Is physical activity or aerobic power more influential on reducing cardiovascular disease risk factors? Med Sci Sports Exerc, 30(10), 1521-1529. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-199810000-00009
Molina-Garcia, P., Notbohm, H. L., Schumann, M., Argent, R., Hetherington-Rauth, M., Stang, J., Bloch, W., Cheng, S., Ekelund, U., Sardinha, L. B., Caulfield, B., Brønd, J. C., Grøntved, A., & Ortega, F. B. (2022). Validity of Estimating the Maximal Oxygen Consumption by Consumer Wearables: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis and Expert Statement of the INTERLIVE Network. Sports Med, 52(7), 1577-1597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-021-01639-y
Rankovic, G., Mutavdzic, V., Toskic, D., Preljevic, A., Kocic, M., Nedin Rankovic, G., & Damjanovic, N. (2010). Aerobic capacity as an indicator in different kinds of sports. Bosn J Basic Med Sci, 10(1), 44-48. https://doi.org/10.17305/bjbms.2010.2734
Reusch, J. E., Bridenstine, M., & Regensteiner, J. G. (2013). Type 2 diabetes mellitus and exercise impairment. Rev Endocr Metab Disord, 14(1), 77-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11154-012-9234-4
Santtila, M., Häkkinen, K., Pihlainen, K., & Kyröläinen, H. (2013). Comparison between direct and predicted maximal oxygen uptake measurement during cycling. Mil Med, 178(2), 234-238. https://doi.org/10.7205/milmed-d-12-00276
Schnohr, P., O’Keefe, J. H., Holtermann, A., Lavie, C. J., Lange, P., Jensen, G. B., & Marott, J. L. (2018). Various Leisure-Time Physical Activities Associated With Widely Divergent Life Expectancies: The Copenhagen City Heart Study. Mayo Clin Proc, 93(12), 1775-1785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.06.025
Weiglein, L., Herrick, J., Kirk, S., & Kirk, E. P. (2011). The 1-mile walk test is a valid predictor of VO(2max) and is a reliable alternative fitness test to the 1.5-mile run in U.S. Air Force males. Mil Med, 176(6), 669-673. https://doi.org/10.7205/milmed-d-10-00444